🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," stated the MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong research".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous online content suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional government level amid national gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to follow this example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.